Skip to content
Add as Preferred Source

Articles

Proton Drive Is Hard to Migrate To or From. Blober Makes It Easy.

The Privacy-First Cloud That Is Awkward to Move Files Into

Section titled "The Privacy-First Cloud That Is Awkward to Move Files Into"

Proton Drive is one of the most privacy-respecting cloud storage services you can pick. End-to-end PGP encryption, Swiss jurisdiction, open-source clients, and a zero-access architecture: not even Proton can read your files. Over 100 million accounts trust it[1]. If privacy comes first, Proton Drive is a strong choice.

The catch is that Proton built sync clients, not transfer tools. The apps sync a folder between your device and Proton Drive, which works fine while Proton is your only cloud. The moment you want to pull files in from Google Drive, Dropbox, or S3, or move a Proton library out to cold storage, you are on your own. The official path is to download everything locally and re-upload it. That is fine for a few gigabytes. For 500 GB of photos spread across three Google accounts, it is a weekend you do not get back.

This guide runs through the pain points one by one, with sources, then shows what Blober does about each. It is also honest about when rclone is still the better tool.

Where Proton Drive Is Officially Supported

Section titled "Where Proton Drive Is Officially Supported"

Proton offers native clients on four platforms, plus web access:

PlatformClientSyncFile BrowserBulk Transfer From Other Clouds
WindowsDesktop appFolder syncVia webNo
macOSDesktop appFolder syncVia webNo
iOSMobile appPhoto backupIn-appNo
AndroidMobile appPhoto backupIn-appNo
LinuxNo clientNoWeb onlyNo
WebBrowserNoYesNo

Look at the last column. Across every platform, on every client, there is no built-in way to transfer files from another cloud into Proton Drive. You download to your machine first, then let the sync client pick the files up, which means you need enough free local storage to hold everything in transit.

If you are on Linux it is worse: there is no desktop client at all. You get the web interface, which works, but it does not support drag-and-drop bulk uploads from other services either.

1. The official apps are sync clients, not migration tools

Section titled "1. The official apps are sync clients, not migration tools"

Proton ships folder-sync apps for Windows and macOS, and photo backup on mobile. None of them can pull files from another cloud. If you want 200 GB of photos from Google Drive inside Proton Drive, the official path is: download everything to your machine, then let the sync client upload it. That needs free local disk equal to your whole library, and it sends every byte over the network twice.

The feature requests confirm the gap. Proton's own UserVoice has long-running requests for exactly this, including "Easy Switch for Google Photos" and a post titled "To switch from Google Photos, Proton drive is not the deal"[2].

2. Google Photos import means Takeout, and the desktop import is Windows-only

Section titled "2. Google Photos import means Takeout, and the desktop import is Windows-only"

Proton's official "How to import from Google Photos into Proton Drive" guide[3] is a Takeout pipeline: export from Google Takeout, wait for the email link, download the zips, unzip them, then import the folder in the web app or the Windows desktop app.

Three things make this painful:

  1. It depends on Takeout. Google prepares the archive in the background, which "may take a while," and the download link expires after a week[4].
  2. The desktop import is Windows-only. The September 2025 announcement that "Google Photos import now supported on Drive for Windows" notes "Photo import support for macOS is coming soon"[5]. On a Mac you are left with the web drag-and-drop path.
  3. Takeout scatters albums. Proton's own guide warns: "Google Takeout splits large exports into multiple parts, but it may not keep photos from the same year in the same part. As a result, photos from the same time period may end up scattered across different folders"[6]. Users then reorganize by year by hand to get clean albums.

3. rclone's Proton Drive support is Tier 4

Section titled "3. rclone's Proton Drive support is Tier 4"

rclone is the standard open-source answer, and its Proton Drive backend works, with caveats worth knowing before you trust a library to it. The rclone docs are explicit:

  • The backend "is currently in Beta" and is rated Tier 4, rclone's lowest support tier[7].
  • Modification times are not preserved: "Proton Drive Bridge does not support updating modification times yet"[8].
  • Setup puts your password in a config file. Config asks for username, password, 2FA, and optionally your OTP secret and mailbox password[9].
  • The underlying library is honest about risk: "There are likely quite a few errors in this library, as there isn't official documentation available"[10].
  • Caching goes stale with concurrent clients: "if there are concurrent clients accessing the same mount point, then we might have a problem with caching the stale data"[11].

4. There is no full Linux desktop client

Section titled "4. There is no full Linux desktop client"

As of 2026 Proton has no full-featured Linux desktop sync client. The June 2026 Proton Drive CLI announcement says a "full-featured desktop client with sync is on its way"[12], and the engine-rebuild post confirms Proton is "actively building one of the community's most-requested features: the Proton Drive client for Linux"[13]. Until then, Linux users get the CLI, which is not a drop-in replacement. Proton's own words: "only the applications include a full synchronization engine that runs in the background"[14].

5. The iOS Files integration is temporarily gone

Section titled "5. The iOS Files integration is temporarily gone"

Proton removed its iOS Files (File Provider) integration and is rebuilding it. A June 2026 post by Proton's iOS lead explains the constraint: the extension runs in a sandboxed process capped at roughly 20 MB of memory, and Proton is reworking its SDK to fit. Proton says "we'd be surprised if this isn't resolved within the year"[15]. In the meantime, iOS users cannot browse their whole Proton Drive from the Files app.

6. Docs and Sheets are rough for power users

Section titled "6. Docs and Sheets are rough for power users"

Proton Docs and Sheets are improving, but community feedback is candid. A top r/ProtonDrive post is titled "As Always Proton Sheet is Buggy and Proton Docs is slow to add feature!" and reports Sheets freezing on large datasets and missing document features like shapes[16]. Other recent complaints include spreadsheet tab ordering reverting on reopen and no PDF export from Sheets. This matters if you are planning to move a heavy Google Workspace workflow over to Proton.

rclone is the canonical open-source tool for cloud storage. It supports 70+ backends and is genuinely excellent at what it does, and its Proton Drive backend works, with the caveats listed above. If you are already in the rclone ecosystem and those tradeoffs fit, rclone is a perfectly good option. Blober is a different style of tool for a different style of user, and the rest of this article is about that.

How Blober Handles Proton Drive Differently

Section titled "How Blober Handles Proton Drive Differently"

Blober takes a different approach: instead of asking for your credentials in a config file, it asks Proton for them.

When you connect Proton Drive in Blober, a browser window opens to Proton's own login page. You sign in with your email, password, and 2FA exactly as you would in any browser. There is no config file with credentials on disk, and nothing to type into a CLI. The provider guide covers how Proton Drive login works in Blober.

What Blober supports with Proton Drive

Section titled "What Blober supports with Proton Drive"
OperationSupportedDetails
BrowseYesNavigate your full folder tree
DownloadYesParallel, resumable downloads
UploadYesParallel uploads, auto-creates folders
DeleteYesMoves to Proton Trash (recoverable)
MetadataYesFilename, size, created and modified dates
Multiple accountsYesEach account gets its own session; run transfers in parallel

What Blober does that Proton's client can't

Section titled "What Blober does that Proton's client can't"
  1. Transfer from any supported provider directly to Proton Drive. Google Drive, Dropbox, AWS S3, Azure Blob, Backblaze B2, Cloudflare R2, DigitalOcean Spaces, Wasabi, Rabata, GoPro Cloud, local disk. No intermediate downloads.
  2. Transfer from Proton Drive to any other provider. Moving away from Proton, or shifting a subset to cold storage on Backblaze? Blober handles it.
  3. Selective file transfer. Browse the source, pick exactly the files you want, transfer only those. Not a full sync of everything.
  4. Saved workflows. Set up "Dropbox to Proton Drive" once and run it whenever you want. The workflow remembers source path, destination path, filters, and file naming templates.
  5. Runs on Linux. Blober works on Windows, macOS, and Linux. Since Proton does not ship a Linux desktop client, Blober is one of the few ways to get a desktop-native Proton Drive experience on Linux without a browser.
  6. Resumable transfers. If your session expires mid-transfer, Blober prompts you to sign in again and picks up where it left off. No files are lost or duplicated.

One detail matters for Google Photos specifically. Blober lists your library chronologically and keeps each photo's capture date, so a transfer lands in date-based folders. It does not recreate Google Photos albums as Proton albums, because Google provides no API for that kind of access. See How to Move Google Photos to Proton Drive.

Here is the situation Blober is built for.

You are on Google Drive or Dropbox, you have decided to move to Proton Drive for privacy, and you have 200 GB of documents and photos spread across folders. Today your options are:

Option A: Manual download and re-upload

  1. Download 200 GB from Google Drive to your machine (hours, needs free disk space)
  2. Wait for the Proton Drive sync client to upload it all (hours more; encryption is CPU-heavy)
  3. Repeat for Dropbox
  4. Hope nothing failed silently

Option B: Google Takeout plus manual upload

  1. Request a Takeout archive (can take days)
  2. Download the archive(s)
  3. Extract, organize, upload to Proton Drive
  4. Storage used: 3x (source cloud + local archive + Proton)

Option C: rclone

  1. Run rclone config and set up your Google/Dropbox and Proton remotes
  2. Provide your Proton credentials when prompted
  3. Run rclone copy gdrive: protondrive: with the flags that fit your scenario
  4. Drive everything from the CLI, including monitoring and restarts

Option D: Blober

  1. Sign in to Google Drive (OAuth) or Dropbox (OAuth)
  2. Sign in to Proton Drive (browser login)
  3. Select the files you want
  4. Start the transfer, then re-run the same workflow whenever you need to

Blober vs rclone for Proton Drive: Side by Side

Section titled "Blober vs rclone for Proton Drive: Side by Side"
Bloberrclone
Auth methodBrowser login on Proton's own pageCredentials in rclone config
InterfaceNative desktop GUICLI
Resume on failureAutomaticManual restart
LinuxNative desktop appCLI
Cross-provider transferBuilt-in (pick source and destination)rclone copy source: dest:
Multiple Proton accountsEach one its own sessionSeparate config remotes
Scriptable automationSaved workflowsCron-friendly CLI
Mount as filesystemNot supportedSupported (FUSE)

A note on modification times, because rclone's Proton backend does not preserve them at all. Blober reads source timestamps for metadata and naming. If preserving exact modification times on Proton is a hard requirement for you, verify it on your own transfer before committing a large library.

Blober is a good fit if:

  • You are migrating into Proton Drive from Google Drive, Dropbox, or another cloud
  • You are moving out of Proton Drive, or shifting a subset to cold storage
  • You are on Linux and want a desktop-native way to manage Proton Drive files
  • You would rather log in through a browser than configure credentials in a file
  • You want a repeatable, named workflow you can re-run later

rclone is a good fit if:

  • You are already in the rclone ecosystem and want one tool for everything
  • You need scriptable, cron-based automation
  • You want to mount Proton Drive as a filesystem (FUSE)
  • You prefer CLI control over a GUI

Is rclone safe to use with Proton Drive? It works, but treat it as experimental. rclone rates the backend Tier 4, calls it "in Beta," and notes the bridge library "likely" has errors[17]. Modification times are not preserved, and setup stores your Proton password and 2FA secret in the rclone config file.

Why can't I import Google Photos to Proton Drive on my Mac? Proton's Google Photos import is Windows-only as of 2026; the announcement says macOS support "is coming soon"[18]. On macOS you are limited to the web drag-and-drop path, which still needs a Takeout export first.

Does Proton Drive work on Linux? Partially. Proton ships a CLI for Linux and is building a full desktop client[19]. There is no official GUI sync client for Linux today. Blober runs natively on Linux and provides one.

Does Blober store my Proton password? No. Blober opens Proton's own login page in a browser window. You sign in there, exactly as you would on drive.proton.me, and your password never passes through Blober.

Is Blober a sync tool? No. Blober is a transfer tool. It moves a selected set of files from one provider to another and stops. Nothing runs in the background and overwrites files, unlike a sync client.

Where do my Google Photos land when I move them with Blober? In Proton Drive's folder tree, organized by each photo's capture date. Blober lists Google Photos chronologically and does not recreate Google Photos albums. If you want the Proton Photos timeline and album view instead, Proton's official Google Photos import (Windows-only) is the supported route, and it sorts imported photos into albums from the folder structure. See How to Move Google Photos to Proton Drive.

Move a Proton Drive library in or out without filling your disk. Blober signs you into Proton through Proton's own login page, then transfers to or from 20+ providers with parallel, resumable transfers. Runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux.

Download Blober at blober.io

Proton Drive vs Proton Photos: What's the Difference?

Proton Drive and Proton Photos Are the Same Product, Two Surfaces

Section titled "Proton Drive and Proton Photos Are the Same Product, Two Surfaces"

Proton markets both "Proton Drive" and "Proton Photos," and the two names trip people up when they are deciding where their photos should go, or where their photos end up after a migration.

Proton Photos is not a separate product. It is the photo-and-album surface inside Proton Drive. Proton Drive is the general-purpose file storage product: folders, sync, sharing, Docs, Sheets. Proton Photos is the media surface built on top of it: timeline, albums, favorites, filters, EXIF-based organization, automatic mobile backup. Both share the same end-to-end encryption, the same storage quota, and one login.

If you upload a JPEG through the Photos tab, it appears in your photo timeline. If you drop the same file into a folder in My Files, it lives in the file tree. Knowing which surface holds your photos matters more than it sounds, because it decides how they are organized after a Google Photos migration.

Proton's web app has two main views:

Proton DriveProton Photos
URLdrive.proton.medrive.proton.me/u/0/photos
What it isGeneral file storagePhoto and video surface
Organized byFolders, subfolders, file namesTimeline (date), albums, favorites, filters
Typical contentDocuments, downloads, work files, archivesCamera roll, photos, videos, albums
Key featuresFolder sync (Windows/macOS), sharing, Proton Docs and SheetsAutomatic mobile backup, albums, favorites, filters[1]
SharingFiles and folders with password and expiry[2]Albums shared by email invite, with view or contribute roles[3]
EncryptionEnd-to-end, zero-accessSame end-to-end encryption, including album names and photo locations[4]
Storage quotaYour Proton Drive quotaSame quota, shared with Proton Drive

The rule of thumb: Photos surface is for things you want in a timeline and albums; Drive surface is for everything else.

  • Camera-roll backups from the iOS and Android apps land in Proton Photos, because automatic photo backup uploads to the Photos surface[5].
  • When you use the Windows app's "Photos import" feature, imported pictures are sorted into albums automatically[6].
  • Files you drag into My Files in the web app go to the Drive surface as ordinary files, even if they are images.

The practical difference is organization: Photos gives you a date timeline, albums, favorites, and filters. Drive gives you a folder tree. A photo sitting in a Drive folder is still encrypted and safe, but it will not show up in your Photos timeline unless it is in the Photos surface.

Why the Distinction Matters for a Migration

Section titled "Why the Distinction Matters for a Migration"

When you move a library out of Google Photos, the destination determines the result:

  • Into Proton Photos: your photos are organized into a timeline and albums, which is the closest to how Google Photos worked. Proton's official Google Photos import does exactly this: it takes your Takeout folder and "automatically upload your photos and then sort them into albums"[7]. Both Google Photos and Proton Photos don't have folders. If you want the timeline and albums, point it at Photos.
  • Into Proton Drive folders: your photos are files in a folder tree. This is fine for archiving, but you lose the timeline and album view unless you then move them into Photos. If you want date-based folder organization, point the destination at a My Files folder.

There is a catch with the official Google Photos import that also matters here: it builds albums from folder structure, and Google Takeout can scatter photos from the same year across different parts, so Proton's own guide recommends manually reorganizing by year first[8]. For a cleaner path, see How to Move Google Photos to Proton Drive, which compares the Takeout route with a direct transfer.

Choose Proton Drive if you want a general encrypted file store: documents, downloads, work files, synced folders, shared files with password protection, and Docs/Sheets.

Use Proton Photos for your personal media: automatic camera-roll backup, a date timeline, albums for trips and events, favorites, and filters.

In practice you get both with the same account. The question is only which surface your media ends up in, and that is decided by where you upload it. For anything photo-like, put it in Photos if you want the timeline and albums. For everything else, use Drive.

Is Proton Photos a separate subscription? No. Proton Photos is part of Proton Drive. It uses the same storage quota and the same plan, so 200 GB of Drive Plus covers both your files and your photos[9].

Are my photos in Proton Photos encrypted? Yes. Everything in Proton Photos uses the same end-to-end encryption as Proton Drive, and Proton says album names and photo metadata like locations are encrypted too[10].

If I upload photos to Proton Drive folders, will they appear in Proton Photos? Not automatically. Files in the Drive surface live in the folder tree; the Photos surface has its own timeline and albums. Import through the Photos flow (or the Windows app's Photos import) to get photos into the Photos surface.

Which surface should I use to migrate Google Photos? Proton Photos, if you want the timeline and albums to match how Google Photos worked. See Proton Photos vs Google Photos for the comparison and How to Move Google Photos to Proton Drive for the mechanics.

Can I move files between the Drive and Photos surfaces? Proton's import flow is the supported path for getting photos into the Photos surface. For moving the other direction, the general file-transfer story for Proton Drive is covered in Migrating To or From Proton Drive.

Proton Photos vs Google Photos: The Honest Comparison

Proton Photos vs Google Photos: Two Different Deals

Section titled "Proton Photos vs Google Photos: Two Different Deals"

Google Photos is the default home for most people's photo library, and it has real costs: only 15 GB of free storage shared with Gmail and Drive, a compression option that downsizes originals, an inactivity policy that can delete your content, and a business model built on analyzing your photos. Proton positions its Photos feature as the private alternative, and the demand is real: a top r/ProtonDrive post titled "Make Proton Photos more like a real alternative to Google Photos" collects a long list of the gaps users hit[1].

Proton Photos is the photo surface inside Proton Drive. It beats Google Photos on privacy: every photo is end-to-end encrypted before upload, nothing is compressed unless you choose it, and Proton says it does not scan your photos or train AI on them. Google Photos still wins on convenience: mature face recognition, AI-powered search, and a far larger feature set. If your priority is keeping photos private and unmodified, Proton wins. If you rely on Google's AI search and automatic face grouping day to day, you will feel the difference.

This article is the honest feature-by-feature comparison. For the actual move, see How to Move Google Photos to Proton Drive.

Proton Photos is not a separate app with its own login. It is the photo and album surface of Proton Drive, at drive.proton.me/u/0/photos. Your photo quota is your Proton Drive quota (5 GB free, 200 GB on Drive Plus), and the photos share the same end-to-end encryption as every other file in Proton Drive[2]. Proton's own framing is direct: "Unlike Google Photos, Proton Drive empowers you to control your pictures, videos, and albums with uncompromising privacy and security"[3].

FeatureProton PhotosGoogle Photos
Free storage5 GB (shared with Proton Drive)15 GB (shared with Gmail and Drive)
End-to-end encryptionYes, zero-access. Proton says "no one, not even Proton, can access your files"[4]No. Google holds the keys and can read your photos
CompressionOriginals stored as-is, no forced downscaling"Storage saver" (previously "High quality") compresses photos[5]
Face recognitionNot availableYes, mature, automatic
AI searchNo (search by date, type, favorites, filters)Yes, natural-language and object search, Gemini integration
AlbumsYes, shared albums with email invites, favorites[6]Yes, shared albums
Auto mobile backupYes, iOS and Android[7]Yes, iOS and Android
Metadata / EXIFPreserved; album names and photo locations are encrypted[8]Preserved, but readable by Google
Scanning / AI trainingProton states it does not scan photos or use them to train AI[9]Google analyzes photos (faces, objects, locations) and has folded Gemini into Photos
Inactivity deletionNo such policy documentedGoogle may delete content after 2+ years of inactivity[10]
JurisdictionSwitzerland, open source, auditedUS-based, subject to US law
Price (paid)Drive Plus: 200 GB, see pricingGoogle One paid tiers (see plans)

End-to-end encryption. This is the entire point. Proton encrypts photos, album names, and metadata like locations on your device before upload, so even Proton cannot read them[11]. Google Photos is not encrypted this way; Google can see your photos, and Proton's marketing presses the point that Google "scans and analyzes the faces" in them[12].

No forced compression. Google's "Storage saver" mode downsizes originals to fit more in your quota, and it is the default that most people have been running for years. Proton stores originals as-is. If you care about keeping full-resolution files, that is a meaningful difference for a large library.

No AI-training or advertising pipeline. Proton's position is that your photos are "too personal to be scanned by surveillance systems or analyzed by algorithms"[13]. Google, by contrast, has integrated Gemini into Google Photos and uses the data for its own models.

You are not renting against a deletion policy. Google's own support page states: "If you're inactive in Google Photos for 2 years or more, your content may be deleted"[14]. Proton does not have an equivalent inactivity-deletion policy for stored photos.

Be honest about the gaps before switching, because they are real:

  • Face recognition. Google automatically groups photos by person and lets you search by face. Proton Photos has no face recognition today.
  • AI search. Google's natural-language search ("photos of my dog at the beach") is best-in-class. Proton searches by date, type, favorite, and filter, not by content.
  • Mature editor and ecosystem. Google Photos has editing tools, shared libraries, partner sharing, and deep Android integration. Proton's Photos surface is younger.
  • Bigger free tier. 15 GB vs 5 GB, both shared with the rest of the account.

What Proton Photos Still Lacks (Per the Community)

Section titled "What Proton Photos Still Lacks (Per the Community)"

The r/ProtonDrive thread that calls for Proton Photos to be "more like a real alternative" lists the specific gaps users hit[15]:

  1. Viewing on-device photos alongside cloud photos in one interface.
  2. iCloud-style storage optimization (full original in the cloud, small preview on the device).
  3. A dedicated duplicates view to find and remove duplicate files.
  4. Editing tools (the post suggests Lumo image editing).
  5. Editing the captured date of a photo to correct wrong timestamps.
  6. A standalone Proton Photos app.

None of these are dealbreakers for a private archive, but they matter if you treat Proton Photos as a full Google Photos replacement for daily browsing.

ProtonGoogle
Free5 GB15 GB
200 GBDrive Plus (see pricing)Google One paid tiers, see plans
500 GBProton Unlimited (VPN + Mail + Calendar + Pass)Google One paid tiers

Proton's paid tier is a flat storage subscription. Google One bundles other Google benefits, but the storage is the part that matters for photos. Prices drift, so check the Proton Drive pricing page and Google One plans before deciding.

Choose Proton Photos if you want originals kept unmodified, end-to-end encrypted, in a zero-access service you are not renting against a deletion policy. Choose Google Photos if you rely on face recognition, AI search, and editing day to day and are comfortable with Google reading your library.

If you switch, the mechanics are covered in depth in How to Move Google Photos to Proton Drive, which compares Proton's official Takeout-based import with a direct transfer, and Migrating To or From Proton Drive covers the general Proton Drive migration story.

Is Proton Photos free? Yes. It is the photo surface of Proton Drive, and the free plan includes 5 GB of storage for photos and files. Proton says that is "enough space to store more than 1000 photos" at an average size of 4 MB[16]. Paid plans start with 200 GB on Drive Plus[17].

Does Proton Photos compress my photos? No. Originals are stored as-is. Google's "Storage saver" mode, by contrast, compresses photos to save space[18].

Does Proton Photos have face recognition? Not yet. Google Photos has automatic face grouping; Proton Photos does not. It is one of the most-requested gaps in the community[19].

Can Proton Photos replace Google Photos? For private, encrypted photo storage: yes. For a drop-in with Google's AI search, face recognition, and editing: not fully yet. This article walks through exactly what you gain and what you give up.

Is Proton Photos the same as Proton Drive? No. Proton Drive is the general file-storage product (folders, sync, sharing, Docs and Sheets). Proton Photos is the photo-and-album surface inside it, optimized for media. See How is Proton Drive different to Proton Photos? for the full explanation.

How do I get my existing photos out of Google Photos? Google has no bulk "download all" button, and Takeout is slow and Windows-only for Proton's import. See How to Move Google Photos to Proton Drive and How to Backup Google Photos Without Google Takeout for the options.

What Is Proton Drive? Features, Plans, and What It's Used For

Proton Drive Is the Privacy-First Cloud Storage Service

Section titled "Proton Drive Is the Privacy-First Cloud Storage Service"

Mainstream cloud storage, meaning Google Drive, Dropbox, and iCloud, can read your files, scan your photos, and use them for ad profiles or AI training. If you do not want a storage company looking at your data, most standard options are a poor fit[1].

Proton Drive is the encrypted alternative from the makers of Proton Mail. Files are encrypted on your device before upload, so not even Proton can read them. It covers the same basics as Google Drive or Dropbox: file storage, folder sync, sharing, photo backup, Docs and Sheets, plus a free 5 GB plan. This guide covers what Proton Drive is used for, how the security works, what it costs, and where it falls short.

Proton Drive is general-purpose file storage, but in practice it is most used for:

  1. Private file storage and sync. Back up documents, photos, and work files, and keep a folder synced between your computer and the cloud with the Windows and macOS desktop apps.
  2. Photo and video backup. The iOS and Android apps back up your camera roll automatically, and Proton Drive organizes photos into albums and a searchable timeline. Proton states the free 5 GB plan is "enough space to store more than 1000 photos," based on an average file size of 4 MB[2].
  3. Private documents and spreadsheets. Proton Docs and Proton Sheets are online editors bundled with Drive, positioned as a private alternative to Google Docs and Google Sheets.
  4. Secure file sharing. You can share files and folders with password protection and expiry dates, and revoke access at any time. Proton says it does "not impose file-size limits or restrict the number of times your contacts can download them"[3].
  5. Sensitive records. Passwords, passports, contracts, and tax files are a natural fit because of the encryption.
  6. A destination when leaving Google, Dropbox, or iCloud. Privacy-conscious users migrating away from Big Tech often land here.

The Security Model: End-to-End and Zero-Access

Section titled "The Security Model: End-to-End and Zero-Access"

Proton's own description of how it works: "We encrypt your files, their names, and more right on your device before they're uploaded to the cloud, so only you hold the keys to unlock them"[4].

This is the zero-access model: the encryption keys never leave your device, so Proton cannot read your data even if asked. The main security points:

  • End-to-end encryption. Files, folder names, and filenames are encrypted client-side using the open-source OpenPGP standard with Curve25519 encryption[5].
  • Zero-access. "No one, not even Proton, can access your files and folders or see their names without your permission"[6].
  • Swiss jurisdiction. Proton is based in Switzerland. Under Article 271 of the Swiss Criminal Code, Proton is prohibited from sharing data with foreign authorities[7].
  • Open source and audited. The clients and encryption libraries are public, and Proton Drive has been audited by Securitum, an independent European security auditor[8].
  • Scale. Proton says it is "trusted by over 100 million users and organizations"[9].
FeatureDetails
File storageStore any file type; files are split into 4 MB blocks for high-performance encryption
Desktop syncWindows and macOS apps sync a local folder with the cloud
Photo backupAutomatic camera-roll backup on iOS and Android, with albums and a timeline
Proton DocsPrivate online document editor
Proton SheetsPrivate online spreadsheet editor with formulas and charts
Secure sharingPassword-protected links with expiry dates and revocable access
File versioningRecover previous file versions (10 years on paid plans)
Encrypted sharing linksShared content is end-to-end encrypted
LinuxCLI available; full desktop client announced as in progress

Proton's consumer plans are the ones most people choose between. Exact prices change, so check the Proton Drive pricing page before deciding[10]:

PlanStorageIncludes
Free5 GBPhotos, documents, Docs and Sheets
Drive Plus200 GB10 years of file version recovery
Proton Unlimited500 GBPlus Proton VPN, Mail, Calendar, and Pass
Proton Duo2 TBUp to 2 users, everything in Unlimited

All paid plans come with a 30-day money-back guarantee, and higher tiers are available through business plans.

Proton Drive runs on Windows, macOS, Android, iOS, and the web[11]. There is no full-featured Linux desktop sync client yet: Proton released a Proton Drive CLI for Windows, macOS, and Linux in June 2026, and states a "full-featured desktop client with sync is on its way"[12].

Proton has been investing heavily in performance. In June 2026 Proton announced it "rebuilt Proton Drive's engine" on a shared SDK, with uploads up to 3x faster and downloads up to 2x faster across platforms[13]. A companion cryptography update made file encryption up to 4x faster: encrypting a 4 MB file dropped from 97 ms to 32 ms on mobile and from 12 ms to 3 ms on desktop[14]. For heavy transfers this matters, because Proton encrypts every block locally, which is CPU work no other storage provider does.

The trade-off for the privacy is that getting files in and out of Proton Drive, at scale, is not a first-class experience. The official clients are sync tools, not migration tools: there is no built-in way to pull files directly from Google Drive, Dropbox, or S3, and the official Google Photos import runs through Google Takeout and is currently Windows-only. Linux users have a CLI but no full sync client, and the iOS Files integration is temporarily unavailable while Proton rebuilds it. Each of these pain points is covered in detail in Migrating To or From Proton Drive.

Is Proton Drive really private? Yes, for what it claims. Files are encrypted on your device before upload using OpenPGP with Curve25519, and Proton runs a zero-access model where it does not hold the decryption keys. Proton says "no one, not even Proton, can access your files"[15]. The code is open source and audited by Securitum.

Is Proton Drive free? Yes. The free plan includes 5 GB of storage for files and photos, plus Proton Docs and Sheets, all end-to-end encrypted[16]. Paid plans start with 200 GB on Drive Plus[17].

Can Proton Drive replace Google Photos? For secure, private photo storage, yes: it has automatic camera-roll backup, albums, favorites, filters, and a timeline. It does not offer Google's unlimited free compression, AI search, or face recognition. See How to Move Google Photos to Proton Drive for the migration path.

How much storage do I get on the free plan? 5 GB, which Proton says holds more than 1000 photos at an average size of 4 MB[18].

Does Proton Drive have a desktop app for Linux? Not a full sync client yet. Proton ships a CLI for Linux and is building a full-featured Linux desktop client on its shared SDK[19][20]. Third-party tools like Blober fill the gap today.

Can I move my files from Google Drive or Dropbox into Proton Drive? Proton offers manual import flows (Takeout for Google Photos, drag-and-drop for Google Drive). There is no direct cross-cloud transfer in the official apps. Blober connects to Proton Drive and can transfer in from Google Drive, Dropbox, S3, Backblaze B2, and 20+ other sources directly. See Migrating To or From Proton Drive for the full comparison.

Blober vs RcloneView

RcloneView and Blober are both desktop apps that move files between cloud storage providers and your own drives without routing data through a middleman server. That is where the similarity ends.

RcloneView is a GUI over rclone, made by Bdrive, the company behind NetDrive[1]. It wraps rclone's command line in a visual file manager, so it inherits rclone's strengths (70+ providers, client-side encryption, cloud mounting)[2] and its limits (whatever rclone cannot do, RcloneView cannot do either).

Blober is a purpose-built transfer app with a one-time license, saved workflows, resumable task history, and two capabilities no rclone-based tool has: native GoPro Cloud support and full Google Photos downloads.

For everyday transfers between mainstream providers, both tools cover the same ground:

  • Desktop GUI, no terminal required
  • Cloud-to-cloud and cloud-to-local transfers that run on your machine
  • Local credential control, with no SaaS dashboard holding your tokens
  • Drag-and-drop, job tracking, and transfer monitoring

If you only move files between Google Drive, Dropbox, and an S3 bucket, either app will do the job. The decision comes down to provider coverage, pricing model, and the edge cases below.

FeatureBloberRcloneView
InterfaceNative desktop GUIrclone GUI
Provider count18 shipped, growing70+ (inherits rclone)
GoPro Cloud✅ Yes (exclusive)❌ No
Google Photos (full library)✅ Yes❌ No
Cloud-to-cloud transfer✅ YesYes
Local filesystem✅ YesYes
Mount cloud as a local driveNoYes (free)
Client-side encryptionPlannedYes (free, rclone Crypt)
Two-way syncPlannedYes
Job schedulingNoYes (subscription)
Metadata path templates✅ YesNo
Workflow persistence✅ Yes, resumable stateJob saving only
Background after closing windowPartial (macOS only)✅ Yes (system tray)
Prevent OS sleep during transfers✅ Yes (while app runs)Not documented
Mobile photo backupNoYes (subscription)
Pricing model✅ One-time licenseFree core + annual subscription
Data path✅ DirectDirect

rclone has no GoPro Cloud backend, so RcloneView cannot connect to GoPro Cloud either. If you shoot with a GoPro and want to move your media from GoPro Cloud to Backblaze B2, AWS S3, Wasabi, or a local NAS, neither rclone nor RcloneView can help.

Blober is the only transfer tool with native GoPro Cloud integration. That makes it the choice for photographers, videographers, and agencies that manage GoPro media libraries.

Google Photos: rclone's Limits Apply to RcloneView

Section titled "Google Photos: rclone's Limits Apply to RcloneView"

RcloneView lists Google Photos among its providers, but it relies on rclone's Google Photos backend. That backend carries real limits, documented by rclone[3]:

  • Since March 31, 2025, rclone can only download photos it uploaded itself. Your pre-existing Google Photos library is off limits.
  • rclone's shared Google Photos client ID is being retired during 2026, so users must create and maintain their own Google Cloud app to keep it working.
  • Downloading full-resolution originals requires a separate headless-browser proxy tool.

Blober connects directly to Google Photos and downloads your entire library at original quality, no Takeout export required. For anyone moving years of photos out of Google Photos, this is the deciding factor.

This is where the two differ most in daily use. RcloneView saves jobs, a real improvement over raw rclone, and by default it keeps running in the system tray when you close its window, so transfers continue in the background.

Blober has jobs and tasks too, but it also saves the whole transfer as a reusable workflow: source, destination, filters, and path templates, all in one configuration you rerun with a single click. Rerun it any time. An interrupted transfer resumes from stored state, skipping files it already finished, instead of starting over. Blober also keeps the operating system from sleeping while the app runs, so a long transfer is not cut off when the machine would otherwise doze off.

For long-running moves over unreliable connections, or media archives with tens of thousands of files, that is the difference between babysitting a transfer and walking away.

Blober can organize files as it copies them. Path templates build the destination folder from file metadata: created date, file name, size, or extension. A year of camera uploads can land in /2026/08/GOPRxxxx.mp4 automatically, instead of one flat folder.

RcloneView writes to the folder you choose, and building that structure means scripting it yourself in every job.

To be fair, RcloneView wins in several areas. Choose it if you:

  • Need a provider Blober has not shipped yet (rclone covers 70+)
  • Want to mount cloud storage as a local drive
  • Want transfers to keep running in the system tray after you close the window
  • Need two-way sync, scheduling, or a mobile photo backup app
  • Prefer a free tool for occasional transfers
  • Already rely on rclone configs, daemons, or the rclone ecosystem

Is RcloneView just a GUI for rclone?

Yes. RcloneView is a GUI front-end built around rclone, so it inherits what rclone supports and what it lacks[4]. It can mount cloud storage and apply rclone's encryption, but it cannot add providers rclone has no backend for, such as GoPro Cloud.

Can RcloneView download my Google Photos?

Only photos rclone uploaded itself. Since March 31, 2025, rclone's Google Photos backend cannot download media it did not upload, so a pre-existing library is out of reach without Google Takeout. Blober connects directly to Google Photos and downloads the whole library at original quality.

Is RcloneView free?

RcloneView is freemium. The free tier covers browsing, transfers, mounting, and encryption, and a paid subscription unlocks scheduling, mobile backup, and multi-window support[5]. Blober is a one-time purchase with no subscription.

Does RcloneView keep running when I close the window?

Yes. Closing the window hides RcloneView to the system tray and transfers keep running in the background. Blober handles that differently: instead of hiding in the tray, it keeps the operating system from sleeping while the app runs and resumes an interrupted transfer from stored state.

Can either tool move GoPro Cloud footage?

No rclone-based tool can, because rclone has no GoPro Cloud backend. Blober is the only transfer tool with native GoPro Cloud integration.

What is a Blober workflow?

A workflow is the whole transfer saved as one reusable configuration: source, destination, filters, and path templates. Rerun it with one click, reuse it after an interruption, and pick up from stored state.

Choose Blober if you:

  • Need GoPro Cloud support (only Blober has it)
  • Want to download your full Google Photos library without Takeout
  • Transfer large volumes on a one-time license, not a recurring subscription
  • Value resumable workflows and metadata-based organization
  • Care about data sovereignty, with no third-party servers touching your files

For a closer look at the same tradeoffs against the raw CLI, read Blober vs rclone.

Download Blober at blober.io