rclone winsWhere rclone is still the better answer
Six jobs rclone does better. If one of them is all you need, you already have the right tool, and it is free.
Plenty of people run both: rclone on the server, on a schedule, and Blober on the desktop for the media files and the providers rclone has no backend for.
- It is free and open source
- MIT licensed, no purchase, no seat count, and you can read every line of it.
- 70+ backends, including the long tail
- It reaches targets Blober has not shipped: SFTP, FTP, WebDAV, Seafile, Nextcloud, and dozens more object stores.
- Mount a remote as a local drive
- FUSE and WinFsp mounts make cloud storage look like a folder to every other program. Blober has no mount.
- Client-side encryption
- rclone crypt encrypts before the upload, so the provider never holds readable bytes. Blober has it planned; rclone has had it for years.
- Two-way sync, deeply configurable
- sync, bisync, check, dedupe, union remotes, track-renames. Blober moves one way only and has no sync engine.
- Runs headless, scheduled and scripted
- A server, a cron entry, a CI step, a systemd unit. Blober is a desktop app, so this is not its job.